The name which can “flash-out” of the mind of a Common man, as soon as you talk about a product, is a brand. Topping the list, are the products popular with their brand-names, while the common man imagines it is THE name of the product itself.
One of the best fitting example is “Xerox” , you can observe even the educated(and well informed) humans, state “take four Xerox of your mark-sheet”, while the “photo-copy” is the right word it is very common the brand name “Xerox” has struck to the process. That is the Value of brand.
There are other brands, where competitors have evolved and succeeded partly to share the product with their brands. We observed recently in a village shop, a common man, asking “Give me a Close-up Colgate”, it took few seconds for me to understand, in the man’s vocabulary “Colgate” means “tooth-paste”. To-day Pepsodent is another brand name in the same product range.
We find many established and favourite brands of the consumers, have maintained their “illusive-first-impression” till date. How many of us know “Peter-England/Louis philippe/Allen Solly” , are Indian brands owned by a subsidy of the Aditya Birla Group?
Brand value is assessed through various parameters and complicated methodologies to calculate. As it would be too cumbersome to explain the valuation methods (and beyond the purview of the purpose of this article), suffice is to say there are establishments world-wide, which specialize in valuing the Brands. A Sample valuation of Brands is tabulate ...
1 | Tata Group | Brand Value: Rs 742.18 billion |
2 | Airtel | Brand Value: Rs 350.44 billion |
3 | Reliance | Industries - Brand Value: Rs 349.24 billion |
4 | HDFC Bank | Brand Value: Rs 240.06 billion |
5 | LIC | Brand Value: Rs 236.05 billion |
6 | The State Bank of India (SBI) | Brand Value: Rs 232.21 billion |
7 | Infosys | Brand Value: Rs 230.64 billion |
8 | ICICI | Brand Value: Rs 166.59 billion |
9 | Mahindra | Brand Value: Rs 156.78 billion |
10 | Godrej | Brand Value: Rs 153.88 billion |
11 | Wipro | Brand Value: Rs 139.69 billion |
12 | Larsen & Toubro | Brand Value: Rs 134.89 billion |
13 | Bajaj Auto | Brand Value: Rs 121.78 billion |
14 | Maruti Suzuki | Brand Value: Rs 115.63 billion |
15 | Axis Bank | Brand Value: Rs 101.32 billion |
16 | ITC | Brand Value: Rs 86.85 billion |
17 | HCL | Brand Value: Rs 83.33 billion |
18 | Hero | Brand Value: Rs 82.53 billion |
19 | ONGC | Brand Value: Rs 66.08 billion |
20 | Asian Paints | Brand Value: Rs 58.14 billion |
There are hundreds of brands, survived decades, driving through many cycles, adding more and more value to the share-holders. However, there are few (very few) brands that failed. One such example is “Kodak”. When the electronic based storage started replacing the “film-technology”, the company had collapsed. An excerpt from the Forbes on the failure of Kodak is appended:
Immensely successful companies can become myopic and product oriented instead of focusing on consumers’ needs. Kodak did not fail because it missed the digital age. It actually invented the first digital camera in 1975. However, instead of marketing the new technology, the company held back for fear of hurting its lucrative film business, even after digital products were reshaping the market.
Another example, is the failure to act in time by Microsoft, when the smart-phones gaining momentum. Apple’s i-phone and Google’s Android were way ahead when Microsoft launched its Window-phone. However, Microsoft, brand has not failed due to various other innovations and Management capabilities.
Our PMS-Bazaar team visited the Axis-PMS and interacted with the staff and the portfolio Manager of the strategy “Axis-Brand-Equity”, Mr. Trideep Bhattacharya.
Mr. Trideep Bhattacharya is a doyen in portfolio Management, with more than 20 years of experience. He is an IIT, B.Tech, with MBA Finance and CFA (USA) qualifications, and has wide exposure to portfolio Management at various Levels world-wide (including UBS/State street Global before joining Axis-AMC).
During the interactions, we have realized that the strategy will suit for moderate risk-appetite investors, with investment horizon of 3+ years. The salient features of the strategy are appended:-
L to R - Mr.Pallavarajan R ( PMS Bazaar ,Mr.Trideep Bhattacharya (Fund Manager- Axis PMS),Daniel GM (PMS Bazaar)
Axis PMS appears to believe in providing the best “risk-adjusted” return to its investors. On further scrutiny to know the process to achieve this factor, revealed few interesting observations …
Axis PMS appears to believe in providing the best “risk-adjusted” return to its investors. On further scrutiny to know the process to achieve this factor, revealed few interesting observations …
The PMS team does ongoing research on Management and analyses competition, margin safety etc.
The companies are selected are based on 3-5 years prospective, and the strategy aims at stable-low-churn-portfolio.
Our PMS-Bazaar team has opined that the Risk Management/analytical skills/and methodology to assess the Management policies of the invested company by the PMS Manager is capable of identifying the “Kodak-style” failures and trim the portfolio accordingly.
We at PMS-Bazaar, believe that the “Axis-brand-Equity” strategy is suitable for investors with moderate-risk-appetite and with more than 3 years investment horizon.
For further details and suitability of matching individual’s risk profile, please feel free to contact info@pmsbazaar.com